![]() Wyler, Leptoquarks in Lepton-Quark Collisions, Phys. Santiago, Effective description of general extensions of the Standard Model: the complete tree-level dictionary, JHEP 03 (2018) 109. Wegman, Closing in on minimal dark matter and radiative neutrino masses, JHEP 06 (2016) 108. Picek, A Critical Analysis of One-Loop Neutrino Mass Models with Minimal Dark Matter, Phys. Schmidt, Revisiting the RνMDM Models, JHEP 05 (2016) 028. Radovcic, Critique of Fermionic RνMDM and its Scalar Variants, JHEP 07 (2012) 039. Tsai, RνMDM and Lepton Flavor Violation, JHEP 12 (2011) 054. Pukhov, Minimal Consistent Dark Matter models for systematic experimental characterisation: Fermion Dark Matter, arXiv:2203.03660. Rocher, Scalar Multiplet Dark Matter, JHEP 07 (2009) 090. Bottaro et al., The last Complex WIMPs standing, arXiv:2205.04486. Bottaro et al., Closing the window on WIMP Dark Matter, Eur. Masiero, Dark Matter Candidates: A Ten-Point Test, JCAP 03 (2008) 022. Yamaguchi, Inflation with low reheat temperature and cosmological constraint on stable charged massive particles, Phys. Hemmick et al., A Search for Anomalously Heavy Isotopes of Low Z Nuclei, Phys. P article D ata collaboration, Review of Particle Physics, Prog. de Salas et al., 2020 global reassessment of the neutrino oscillation picture, JHEP 02 (2021) 071. Volkas, Exploding operators for Majorana neutrino masses and beyond, JHEP 01 (2021) 074. Jenkins, A Survey of Lepton Number Violation Via Effective Operators, Phys. Leung, Classification of effective neutrino mass operators, Nucl. Yaguna, Models with radiative neutrino masses and viable dark matter candidates, JHEP 11 (2013) 011. Hirsch, Systematic classification of three-loop realizations of the Weinberg operator, JHEP 10 (2018) 197. Hirsch, Neutrino masses beyond the minimal seesaw, J. Hirsch, Systematic classification of two-loop realizations of the Weinberg operator, JHEP 03 (2015) 040. Winter, Systematic study of the d = 5 Weinberg operator at one-loop order, JHEP 07 (2012) 153. Volkas, From the trees to the forest: a review of radiative neutrino mass models, Front. Babu, Model of ‘Calculable’ Majorana Neutrino Masses, Phys. Zee, Charged Scalar Field and Quantum Number Violations, Phys. Li, Neutrino Masses, Mixings and Oscillations in SU(2) × U(1) Models of Electroweak Interactions, Phys. Zee, A Theory of Lepton Number Violation, Neutrino Majorana Mass, and Oscillation, Phys. Joshi, Seesaw Neutrino Masses Induced by a Triplet of Leptons, Z. Senjanović, Neutrino Masses and Mixings in Gauge Models with Spontaneous Parity Violation, Phys. Valle, Neutrino Masses in SU(2) × U(1) Theories, Phys. Slansky, Complex Spinors and Unified Theories, Conf. Senjanović, Neutrino Mass and Spontaneous Parity Nonconservation, Phys. Yanagida, Horizontal gauge symmetry and masses of neutrinos, Conf. Minkowski, μ → eγ at a Rate of One Out of 10 9 Muon Decays?, Phys. Ma, Pathways to naturally small neutrino masses, Phys. Weinberg, Baryon and Lepton Nonconserving Processes, Phys. Many of the models in our list lead to Landau poles in some gauge coupling at rather low energies and there is exactly one model which unifies the gauge couplings at energies above 10 15 GeV in a numerically acceptable way. We then study the RGE evolution of the gauge couplings in all our 1-loop models. In the exit class the 38 refers to models, for which one (or two) of the internal particles in the loop is a SM field, while the 368 models contain only fields beyond the SM (BSM) in the neutrino mass diagram. Here, 115 is the number of DM models, which require a stabilizing symmetry, while 203 is the number of models which contain a dark matter candidate, which maybe accidentally stable. Considering 1-loop models with new scalars and fermions, we find in the dark matter class a total of (115+203) models, while in the exit class we find (38+368) models. Here, we define “exits” as particles that can decay into standard model fields. First, we discuss that there are two possible classes of 1-loop neutrino mass models, that allow avoiding stable charged relics: (i) models with dark matter candidates and (ii) models with “exits”. In this paper we study the related question of how many phenomenologically consistent 1-loop models one can construct at d=5. It is well-known that at tree-level the d = 5 Weinberg operator can be generated in exactly three different ways, the famous seesaw models.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |